is COUNTING CALORIES helpful
“calories counting is a myth, a mental disease”
TCMchef Raphael
Because our human body (the vessel in this equation) is a hyper-complicated organism, no two of us are ever identical. The calories mentioned on a box of cereal do not include your height, weight, age, density, and activity output. Our physiological differences aside, the product you consume may have grown under various circumstances; veggies grown in the earth are not equal in their nutritional contents to salads grown hydroponically.
Our gut health and how we digest foods play a crucial role in how we convert what we eat into sustainable energy. Although most food in packages today features calorie counts, this information is about as useless as the federal law that drive-through automated teller machines (ATMs) must have brail to facilitate access for the blind.
Food is energy to the body, but how we break down what we eat depends on how healthy our digestive enzymes are. Digestion starts when we are grinding food in the mouth. The digestive process continues as we break down the contents in our stomach and the remainder of the digestive tract. Complex food molecules are broken down into simpler structures—including sugars and amino acids—that can travel within the blood to nourish tissues or can be stored in cells. That reservoir of chemical bonds and simpler molecules depends on yet another set of variations that set us apart: health, where we live, how we live, and genetic predispositions.
knowing your calories intake only makes sense if you know your vital signs & bloodwork:
Fats provide about nine calories per gram versus carbohydrates and proteins, which support us with an average of four calories per gram. Most fiber is loaded with only one or two calories per gram because our digestive enzymes can’t easily break down most plant-based cells. However, if we prepare those foods correctly or chew them more thoroughly, they can provide more energy (i.e., more calories).
Take a Caesar salad with 50 grams of chicken (200 calories), 20 grams of cheese (180 calories), and 100 grams of lettuce (100 calories). For this Caesar salad, you could find the total calories listed as 480. That serving portion would fit into a large coffee mug. However, if you ate this same salad slowly and chewed it thoroughly, you could derive from it over 650 calories of energy. Food sellers count on people gorging; this way, the sellers get away with estimating lower calorie counts.
If you gave this salad to a teenage football player who was six feet tall and who weighed 200 pounds, he would probably eat it in four bites in less than 30 seconds and gain from it less than 150 calories of energy, which he could burn off within 40 minutes of walking. If you gave the same salad to Grandma, who was 5’5” tall and who weighed 140 pounds, suppose it took her ten minutes to eat the same portion… She could store over 500 calories from eating that salad, which would generate enough energy to sustain her throughout a four-hour walk. Sellers bend facts for their own benefit: The seller.
Attempting to measure calorie intake serves only one purpose. Calorie counts provide yet another excuse for eating artificial food products, crackers, and other foods low in nutritional value with empty calories, foods loaded with synthetic byproducts to make the product appear the way more wholesome foods do, and to satisfy your cravings. You “feed in” on a psychological problem created by nutritionistas so you’re occupied with an useless activity and they shine with their social media crap. Now you are controlled by apps, a nutrition calculator watch, and even a futuristic fridge feeding you calorie junk-science while your caloric-friends endlessly calculate calories by a non-scientific standard. That stress!
oh, the calories conundrum, and some out there take it so darn’ serious!
Counting calories might seem straightforward, but it’s far from a one-size-fits-all equation. The truth is, agricultural factors like soil quality, farming methods, and geographic origin can dramatically influence the nutritional content of what you’re eating. For instance, a salad grown hydroponically might have significantly fewer calories—around 10—compared to its farm-grown counterpart, which can range from 400 to 500 calories. This variance highlights a critical oversight: relying solely on calorie counts without considering the food’s provenance can be misleading. Simply put, unless you’re aware of where and how your food was grown, you’re essentially guessing your calorie intake. Ignoring these nuances might result in misunderstandings about your diet and nutrition. It’s high time we acknowledge the complexity of our food systems and make informed choices.
current research: Hydroponically grown Romain lettuce had lower concentrations of bioactive components and significantly less antioxidant capability.
My mockingly approach encapsulates the nuances without directly critiquing a lack of understanding—though I hope it does prompt readers to reconsider their assumptions. As a TCMchef I cringe when people ask me how many calories are in a meal prepared for them… What really matters is how you eat it, chew it, digest it and how much carbonated ice water you gulp down and under what time restrictions you eat… At what elevation do you consume currently, your age, your activity level, your liver function and blood pressure… How much salt you ate earlier this day, the vitamins/medicines you swallowed and the time, month you eat.
calories are the least of anyones concern when eating healthy!
If you find yourself in a health situation in which you convince yourself that counting calories is the solution, you’re just kidding yourself!
Contact me for a zoom consultation
